Safe State vs. Swing State

Ben Mason Eng. 1001 sect. 38 9/26/12 The voter turnout Playground Play it safe? Or swing? This is a concern that arises for presidential prospects every iv years as we approach presidential alternatives. First, thither argon two terms to be recognised safe state and swing state. In a safe state the presidential candidate of a particular society has the ample majority of support of that states voters, regularly, so that he/she can safely assume the complaisant outcome of the states electoral college votes. Some ell-known safe states are California for democrats, and Texas for republicans. On the contrary, there are states that are non like safe states and no single candidate or party has overwhelming support of the votes. These are called swing states or battleground states. Some typesetters cases of swing states of this election are Florida, Iowa, Colorado, and others. In the voting world, the president is decided through representative votes by the states. This is called t he electoral college. A presidential candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the election. For 48 states, it is a inner-takes-all election which means that whichever candidate receives a majority of the frequent vote, or a plurality of the popular vote (less than 50 percent hardly more than any other candidate), takes all of the states electoral votes. Maine and Nebraska are the only states that use a proportional vote system. In these states, there could be a split of electoral votes among candidates. (Dugan) The electoral college plays a huge role on the topic of safe states and swing states by effecting the behaviors of presidential candidates. For instance, safe states that re known to vote a certain substance will not receive near as much attention or bell ringing as swing states during the times close to elections. This is why candidates counterbalance over swing states that may only have as infinitesimal as 4 electoral votes, instead of fighting for states with a lot more. (Dugan) An example of this would be Romney and Obama spending large amounts of m unmatchedy campaigning in a swing state such as Iowa with 7 electoral votes and very little in a safe state like California with 55 electoral votes. (Politico) Candidates do not put a lot of effort into afe states because it is unlikely that he/she can change the minds of the mint there. Also, one will not spend time and money campaigning in safe states because he/she may already have the support of the mass in those states. As you can see, the electoral college is key to apprehensiveness how safe states and swing states work. There is a kind of two party dictatorship in todays American politics and the vast majority of voters fall into these two categories or parties Republican or Democratic. Every election period there are two candidates unning for these parties. In order for the candidate to get the vote of a particular state he/she must run a campaign. The aggressiveness and frequency o f the campaigns big businessman divert due to the status of a partys influence over certain states. Sometimes the candidates have to modify there stance or ideals on certain issues to fit to that particular state. An example would be that some candidates may want to position themselves to appeal to a certain ethnic group of that area. Obama has tried to appeal to the Latino vote in Colorado due to the growing umber of Hispanic immigrants. (Larcinese) This may be a smart move because he is usually popular among minority groups. In return, Romney has tried to address people in rural areas. Recent polls show that he is 14 percent more popular with people in rural areas than Obama is. (Gruber) Also, issues that are a big concern in an area may be emphasized. Things like restoring the health of a declining ecosystem may be brought up in an area that is torture from deforestation or pollution to secure the votes of people concerned about that subject.Other factors play into campaignin g in swing states as well. Many times instead of stretching the truth, a candidate will simply neglect to bring up the matter, whatever it may be. The sensitive issues of a certain state might be avoided in order to sound better on a vague level. Slogans are do short and vague for this reason to get anyone to jump on the band wagon. Making the issues fit the political views of the people in a certain area or background is imperative to getting favorable votes. Candidates do whatever it takes to look good or appeal to people.This sometimes means mud-slinging or making the opposing candidate look bad. This has been going on since the beginning of presidential runoffs. A great example of this would be Romneys war on women as said by Obama because of Mitt Romneys stance on issues for women. This gives the allusion that Romney doesnt worry about womens health issues so that Obama would be favorable to women. (Politico) In return, Mitt Romney has attacked Obamas healthcare plan truism that Obama wont cover people with preexisting conditions. This is an ongoing thing that will never stop.There will invariably be differences in views that candidates will trash each other with. There are a vast array of ways to advertise to capture the hearts and minds of would-be voters. The key to it all is appealing to the people that have the most stake in the situation and convincing them to vote a certain way to decide the victor of the presidential race. As you can see, the role of swing states and safe state are crucial to how things are done and the way that American politics play out. Works Cited Larcinese, Valentino. Allocating the U. S. Federal calculate to the States. The Journal of Politics. Wiley Library. , 27 Apr 2006. Web. Vol. 68 May 2006 Gruber, Jonathan. Rural Favor and Polls Hastings Center Report. Wiley Library. , 8 Feb 2012. , Sep,Oct 2006 Politico. org. , News, Analysis, Candidates, and Polls. Real Clear Polls. Swing state view. , Sep 26 2012 archive. fai rvote. org/e_college. htm. , Maine and Nebraska. Center for voting and Democracy. , copyright 2002. , declivity 10 2009 Dugan, Andrew. Gallup. com/poll/swingstate. htm. , Swing State Voters. Washington D. C. , Race Track 2012 Sep 9 2012