Logics - Analysis of an Article by Peter Kreeft Essay

Logics - Analysis of an name by Peter Kreeft - Essay ExampleApart from many articles, he has written many books much(prenominal) as The Snakebite Letters, The Philosophy of Jesus, The Journey A Spiritual Roadmap for Modern Pilgrims, Prayer The Great Conversation immediately Answers to Tough Questions About Prayer etc. The major idea behind this article The Apple tilt Against Abortion is to educate people about the consequences of performing abortion. Peter Kreeft argues against abortion in a philosophic manner throughout this article. He is making in depth analysis of the abortion issue with the abet of answering certain questions like Who homosexual are, what are the rights of human, why abortion is wrong etc and topics such as basis of deterrent exampleity, differences between the rights of all people and the rights of some people, pedigrees from skepticism etc. He also tries to meditate different cases with respect to abortion by taking different combinations such as The foetus is a person, and we know that The fetus is a person, but we dont know that The fetus isnt a person, but we dont know that The fetus isnt a person, and we know that (Kreeft, 2000) Approach This article is mainly analytical in nature. The author tries to avoid the workout of any instinctive methods in this article. He has analyzed abortion from various angles. Different dimensions of abortion were attractively explained in this article. For example, the author took the example of an apple and the understanding of ordinary people about it, to attract the circumspection of the readers towards the topic. Since the author is a philosopher, a philosophical approach can be visible throughout this article. He explains various dimensions of abortion with the help of comparisons, analogies etc. It is difficult for ordinary people to understand the problems associated with abortion, especially the moral issues. The author tries to explain all those issues in a simple, but comprehensi ve manner so that anybody who settle pile to perform abortion may think twice or thrice before doing so, after practice this article. In short, the author succeeded in persuading the readers of this article to argue against abortion. Different kinds of reasoning in the article Inductive, deductive, causal and analogical reasoning techniques were used throughout this article. The following paragraph is an example of an inductive argument picture in this article. I have heard it argued that we do not treat any other species in the traditional way that is, we do not assign equal rights to all mice. Some we kill (those that come in into our houses and prove to be pests) others we take good care of and preserve (those that we find useful in testing ground experiments or those we adopt as pets) still others we simply ignore (mice in the wild). The argument concludes that therefore, it is only supposition or tradition (the two are often confused, as if nothing rational could be pas sed down by tradition) that assigns rights to all members of our own species (Kreeft, 2000). The above argument is an example of inductive reasoning. It is not necessary that the argument needs to be 100% right to make it as an example of inductive reasoning. It should be notable that cultures like Buddhism or Jainism treats any type of killing - killing of animal or killing of human - as a sin. But cultures like Islam or Christianity do not treat killing of animals as a sin. In short, the above argument may not be conclusive or align everywhere, but it helps the author to strengthen his arguments